The focus movement of both lens series is superb. The Compact Primes, despite their name, aren’t so compact compared to the ZF.2 lenses. A classic portrait-length prime, the Canon EF-mount Planar T* 85mm f/1.4 ZE from ZEISS is a short telephoto lens, ideal for producing shallow depth of field effects and isolating focus on … I heard that Nikon lenses dont perform optimally on 16mm film cameras, is it the case with Zeiss … The Compact Primes will provide a much smoother, creamier bokeh thanks to the 14 bladed aperture design but you won’t be able to pull off the crazy shallow depth of field shots because the CP.2 lenses are all limited to f/2 (T2.1) at most. Sharing the same Optics as the Compact Prime … For wide-angle primes … This lens family is characterized by its classic appearance and high optical performance. Great post! Maybe f/2.0 has more advantages for motion picture? Renowned Carl Zeiss contrast and resolution brings out the best in α7 series full frame E-mount bodies. Los números T tienen en cuenta la tramitancia de luz a través de la lente. After all, they are in fact the exact same glass but in a different housing, right? May 29, 2019 at 03:38 AM A rounder aperture makes for rounder bokeh, smoother background blur at wider apertures. Among the revolutionary features, perhaps the most notable is the OLED focus scale read out which provides focus distance and depth of field limits on a convenient, unobtrusive display. However, a lot of cinematographers are opting for the ultra budget conscious still photo lenses with Cine-Mods to bring them up to cinema spec. I have 7 ZEISS ZF.2 primes (2 Otus & 5 Milvus) and they all work perfectly on the Z6 & Z7. Details about Zeiss 21mm ZF.2 f/2.8 Prime Lens. The focus and aperture are smooth, the aperture functions properly, and … I am aware of the Zeiss 25mm's field of curvature issue but can not see this being a problem the way I would use the lens. But what makes the Compact Primes so much more expensive than, say, a Zeiss ZF.2? The CP.2 lenses wipe the floor with the ZF.2s in this category. the Zeiss CP2 blow the ZE away. The true benefit to the CP.2s is the mechanical build quality and construction. The ZF.2 (Nikon F) mount version features a manual aperture while the ZE (Canon EF) mount version utilizes an electronic, fly-by-wire aperture that is controlled exclusively by an active EF mount camera. I got a Scarlet and have been borrowing my buddies non modded Nikkors but I want to get a set of my own glass and I am having trouble deciding between your super speed zfs and getting an old angie pl zoom and having it serviced… Basically trying to spend like 4,500 or less right now… Thanks, ps been reading your forum and posts on RU a lot, very helpful! Speaking of gears, yeah, the Compact Primes come equipped with cine-standard 32-pitch gears where the ZF.2 lenses sport a knurled grip instead. The ZF.2 (Nikon F) mount version features a manual aperture … The Compact Primes all have a uniform, internal focus housing which means the is no telescoping of the barrel and the focus and iris gears are all the same distance from the mount. Their compact size can be deceiving compared to the image quality produced by these tiny titans. Love the CPs, they are my lense of choice for work on my C300. As a matter of fact I only have one zoom so far. Believe me, I’ve tried. But the Compact Primes take the movement a step farther, rotating almost 300°. View Full Version : Zeiss ZF/compact primes vs. Standards. Again, not a huge deal breaker. This brings me to my next difference. Typical for most fast primes the ZF 28 shows some … If you don’t mind listing which ZF’s pull further and are more like CP2’s, that would be great! However, I really don’t like the Zeiss ZE look on this video comparison: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xapiFu5xcXI Moving on…, I already covered some of the differences in the apertures of each lens, but another minor difference is the movement of each. This isn’t just a numbers game. However I’m having trouble with something specific and maybe someone here can help me. The Zeiss Distagon 28mm f/2 produces a moderate degree (~1.8%) of barrel distortion. The Compact Primes take it a step beyond pretty images and provide a professional set of features that can be very valuable to a cinematographer and his/her crew. If you’re looking at the front element of the lens, rotation to infinity is counter-clockwise, whereas every cinema lens, as well as almost every lens manufacturer in the world, rotates clockwise towards infinity when looking at the front element. Sort of… There are quite a few features that really separate the two lenses no matter how similar their heritage is. They have all been maintained well and are in good … On a similar note, the focus rotation direction of the ZF.2 lenses is what most cinematographers would consider backwards. The Zeiss ZK lenses are … The Compact Primes obviously come from the factory with a buttery smooth aperture movement, as a cinema lens should. The ZF.2s are Zeiss’ latest all manual still photo lenses. There would be very, very minor optical differences mostly due to the shape of the aperture blades, more rounded at all stops in the CP.2s. This isn’t a deal breaker considering some shooters these days have become accustomed to quicker, shorter focused pulls on still lenses but there is no denying the expanded focus throw of the Compact Primes is far more accurate. With 35mm Full Frame coverage, available exclusively in Sony E mount, the Loxia primes are an excellent choice for pairing with ultra high resolution Sony mirrorless cameras. The Ultra Prime Lenses are lightweight standard speed lenses that are a perfect optical match to the high speed ARRI/Zeiss Master Prime Lenses. The Compact Primes vary in weight a little bit because of the different optical designs and quantity/size of glass elements but their diameter and length are all standardized except for the two close focus 50mm and 100mm lenses. Typical for most fast primes the ZF 35 shows some … The same lens, optically, is limited to f/2 (T2.1) on its CP.2 cousin. Is Zeiss still worth it? If you have the dough and the need for a more user friendly feature set, the Compact Primes are a great tool to have at your disposal as an owner-operator, at a relatively reasonable price. There are plenty of follow focus units on the market with a flip-flop gear box that will allow you to reverse the direction of your follow focus, essentially “correcting” the focus rotation of a ZF.2. It’s the same glass. Sure the ZF.2 lenses are smaller, lighter, and overall more portable than the Compact Primes. @Matthew Duclos, why 50mm f/2.0, and not f/1.4 ? The focus rotation is about 300 degrees in each prime whereas the ZF.2s have a much shorter rotation, as little as 90 degrees or less in some lenses. The same lens exists in “ZE” version for the Canon mount, which … The possibilities of using scene programs, different types of … Thank you for this article! If it breathes the same, both are fast, what are the real, if any down sides for getting duclos modded zf speed set vs a cp2 super speed set for three plus times the price? A classic design inherited and evolved over the past few decades, the Zeiss Classic primes offer manual focus in a anodized aluminum body. At $3,900 a piece, or a set of five lenses just shy of $20k, the Compact Primes are some of the cheapest options out there for what I would consider professional cinema lenses. The ZF.2 housings vary from lens to lens just like their aperture. The crowning achievement of Zeiss' design and engineering prowess. Zeiss 18mm F3.5 (T3.5) ZF Distagon SLR prime wide angle lens Nikon mount. The mechanically limited apertures are just that… A mechanical-physical limitation in that the aperture movement is being restricted to stop at a smaller aperture. The "Jena" lenses are Zeiss … This is handy when swapping lenses during a shoot since you don’t have to think about repositioning your follow focus or motors. Thank you for this writeup. The Otus primes offer unrelenting image quality, even wide open at f/1.4. Condition:--not specified Los número F por el contraría son solo una estimación matemática de la cantidad de luz que atravesará el objetivo. can someone translate this comment in English Please. The Compact Primes … glass for a fairly decent price with proper EOS adapters (AF etc.). thanks! … They just happen to make very pretty images when mounted to a motion picture camera as well as a still photo camera. Carl Zeiss Planar 50 mm f0.7 Lens (Modifie... < 1 > Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm with Kollmorgen Ada... < 1 > Zeiss Compact Prime Lenses < 14 > Zeiss DigiPrime Lenses < 21 > Zeiss Jena Lens < 2 > Zeiss Supreme Prime Series Lenses < 2 > Zeiss ZE Prime Lenses < 6 > Zeiss ZF.2 Prime Lenses < 1 > Zeiss … The Zeiss Distagon 35mm f/2 produces a moderate degree (~1.8%) of barrel distortion. I have some questions, with a Nikon to Arri standard adapter on an Arriflex 16s, how a Zeiss zf2 (nikon mount) performs against a Zeiss standard speed or ultra speed on Arri mount? Zeiss ZF /ZF.2 Micro Prime Lens Kit (18mm, 25mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, 100mm). ZEISS has been manufacturing large format cinematography lenses that cover FF35 and beyond for more than ten years. Condition is "Used". Thanks for the article as always Matthew, really appreciate your professionalism, and I finally made up my mind as I’m going with the ZF.2 for various reasons including budget, have a few question regarding usability with the canon DSLR crop sensor. This can be overcome fairly easily with the addition of a Cine-Mod focus gear but you’re still not going to gain an aperture gear even with the Cine-Mod on the ZF.2 lenses. Cometes un grave error cuando supones que puedes equiparar un nº T/ a un nº F/. Photo by Laura Jenkin. Looking forward to read more on zoom lens. Anyway, back on track…. The 50mm f/1.4 ZF.2 is the smallest of the range, almost even pocketable with a mere 54mm diameter. Ok, I am a big fan of primes. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Onto round two, the housings. Lens adapter Nikon ZF to Canon EOS available A classic design inherited and evolved over the past few decades, the Zeiss Classic primes offer manual focus in a anodized aluminum body. Zeiss 21mm ZF.2 f/2.8 Prime Lens. That’s the beauty of the option Zeiss has provided. So which lenses take the cake in the end? Zeiss released their CP.2 (Compact Primes) cinema lenses about a year ago, not long after they dropped their original Compact Primes on the market. I rate it cosmetically a (10-). I’ll start with the optics. Leonard Levy. One more nice article with lots of facts. Nils J. Nesse. The Loxia primes are among the newest addition to the Zeiss lineup featuring true fully manual focus and iris controls. …Almost. Unfortunately the breathing is identical between the ZF.2 and CP.2 as they both come from the same optical design. Thank you, Matt! Zeiss' foray into the world of auto-focus, the Batis prime lenses feature a composite resin body which provide an ultra light, yet durable design. The chart above has a real-world size of about 120x80cm. The next item is the aperture. Buy ZEISS 135mm f/2 Apo Sonnar T* ZF.2 Lens for Nikon F Mount featuring 135mm Telephoto Prime Lens, Fits Nikon F Mount Cameras, Aperture Range: f/2-22, Minimum Focus Distance of 2.62' (0.8 m), … I would recommend the 21mm f/2.8, 35mm f/1.4, 50mm f/2.0, and 85mm f/1.4. Not exactly revolutionary, but a nice feature for an ever-changing camera market. Hello all! Anyone know how the Zeiss ZF and compact primes compare to the older but more expensive Zeiss standard primes … These lenses are incredibly sharp and fast. very well written. The Classic ZF.2 lenses from ZEISS have enjoyed an outstanding reputation with photographers and cinematographers all over the world for many years now – and rightly so. It should also be noted that Zeiss’ Canon Eos mount version of the ZF.2, the ZE, does not share the same backwards rotation of the ZF.2 since it is a native Canon mount lens. The focus scales on the CP.2 have far more marks that are spaced nicely and very easy to read with precise witness marks for each distance. A quick side note, there is a very obvious naming difference for the ZE and ZF lenses Z=Zeiss, E=Canon EF, and F=Nikon F, simple. Any hints as to what equates to what? The last feature I’ll cover is the overall build of each lens. Zeiss esteemed collection of prime lenses designed for photography with motion picture in mind are an ideal solution for the cinematographer looking to shed the size, weight, and price of a higher-end prime lens. 08-07-2008, 07:32 AM. The T* coating works with an … Por cierto anque los objetivos CP.2 y los ZF compartan esquema optico, no tiene porqué compartir la calidad del vidrio ótico, la calidad de las palas del diafrágma, que sea continuo o no como lo son los ZF, la perfecta escala de distancia de enfoque, el mayor recorrido de este aro… podría seguir justificando porque los CP.2 valen mucho más que los ZF pero solo me quedaré en que Zeiss gracias a dios es una de las empresas más comprometidas con la calidad, y nunca intentaría estafar ofertando 2 productos de igual calidad a distinto precio… Un saludo. This is an in-depth review of the Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZF.2 lens, a manual focus prime lens for the Nikon F mount. I can’t stop reading positive review about ZE/ZF from photographer. Re: Auto focus Zeiss ZF primes In reply to e_dawg • Jun 20, 2008 If you want AF Zeiss lenses, you need to buy a Sony, it's just that simple. They have been developed in a collaboration between ARRI and Zeiss. The mount is swapped by removing a few screws from the mount, shimming, and replacing with the desired mount. Many of the Contax primes still outresolve many other primes. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Again, easily overcome with a Cine-Mod, so not a deal breaker there either. I’m trying to replace my follow focus gear with one that fits the CPs. The ZF.2 lenses come in a Nikon F mount only. This Zeiss 55mm f1.4 Otus ZF.2 Lens, #51515095, is in excellent condition with only faint handling wear. Available in over a dozen focal lengths, the Zeiss Classic Primes are an excellent option for a wide range of applications. Smooth, viscous, and accurate. Either route is going to produce excellent results just as any Zeiss lens should. Un objetivo que sea T/2.1 puede llegar a ser más luminoso en la práctica que un objetivo F/1.4. The ZF.2s vary from lens to lens ranging from a manageable 90° to a pleasing 275° on some focal lengths. ARRI/Zeiss Ultra Prime Lenses have the widest focal range of prime lenses giving you the flexibility to get the coverage you want. Now, my father used to use Zeiss glass in his days and I have a guy who is selling his Zeiss Sonnar etc. For example, the f/2.0 lenses are equal to a T2.1. That would give you the best coverage with the best quality. The Contax line was discontinued and superseded by the ZE/ZF … Tienen en cuenta la perdida de luz cuando se refracta a traves de las distintas lentes que tiene el objetivo. The chart above has a real-world size of about 120x80cm. NIKON D750 + Zeiss Distagon T* 2/35 ZF.2 @ ISO 100, 1/250, f/2.0 Lens Handling. Modern Zeiss prime lenses are all of very high quality, all-metal build and the Zeiss 35mm f/2 is no exception. It is very helpful. We’ve tested eight 50mm primes on the Nikon D750, with scores ranging from an astronomic 44 points for the Carl Zeiss Distagon T* Otus 1.4/55 ZF.2 to a low of 25 points on the Carl Zeiss Planar T 50mm f1.4 ZF.2. Zeiss 25mm Super Speed MkII with the Sony FS7. One of the primary upgrades the CP.2 lenses received from the original Compact Primes is the interchangeable mount. The ZF.2 lenses use a fairly standard 9 bladed iris whereas the CP.2 lenses utilize a much more rounded 14 bladed iris. The Zeiss primes (at least) will offer me quality and hopefully cope well with any megapixel camera of the future. But if you’re trying to impress some producers or some makeup artist babes on set, lets face it, the Compact Primes are going to do you justice every time. They don't look exactly like ZF's either, its the older T coating. I can’t attest to this as I haven’t seen any difference in the glass or the test results produced by the Compact Primes, but it looks good on a brochure. All-in-all, both lenses offer very good performance and near identical image quality, but with completely different price tags. The ZF.2s being the still photo lenses they are, use a spring loaded iris with clicks at every third stop increment. i was thinking the ZF.2 18mm, 35mm, 50mm and the 85mm.. will that be the best set to cover the widest range? If the Super Speeds are siblings to the Contax line, the Zeiss Classic (ZE and ZF.2) would be their descendants. There has been a lot of debate about the value of the Compact Primes. The Batis lenses are a formidable tool for Sony E mount cameras. Very helpful! Zeiss makes their ZE line which features a Canon EF mount, but lacks a manual aperture ring making them useless for motion picture. With a DxOMark Score of 34 tested on the D800, the Carl Zeiss Distagon T 25mm f/2 ZF.2 for Nikon ties with another Carl Zeiss wide-angle prime, the 35mm f/1.4 ZF.2 for 12 th place of all lenses. It’s hard to say. I see on all CP posts a “32 pitch” gear, but when i search for the part for my Cavision FF i only see references to “.6 or .8” pitches. With an influx of new primes with a range of price tags, there is no shortage of choices for the budding cinematographer or even the veteran looking to invest in some glass. The ZF.2 lenses use a traditional photo distance scale with a convenient depth-of-field range engraved right on the lens, but lack the quantity and accuracy of distance marks that the CP.2s feature. An entire five lens set of the ZF.2 lenses can fit in one carry on case, whereas the Compact Primes are going to require a much larger, more protective flight case that will never make it past Bertha, the flight attendant. They just happen to make very pretty images when mounted to a motion picture camera as well as a still photo camera. If you want the nice cinematic look of the CP.2 lenses but don’t have deep enough pockets, you can still get the exact same glass in a cheaper housing in the form of ZF.2s. I too would like to know if there is any difference between CP2 and ZF2 with regards to focus breathing. Is there any difference between the back focus (I’ve read your article about it Got the general idea) between the two as I know the ZF.2 would be equipped with a adaptor, or is it already properly shimmed (if that s the proper world for it). Zeiss ZF Primes: 15mm (F2.8), 21mm (F2.8), 25mm (F2), 28mm (F2), 35mm (F1.4), 50mm (F1.4), 50mm Macro (F2), 85mm (F1.4), 100mm Macro (F2), 135mm (F2) For example, the 50mm ZF.2 tops out at f/1.4, a commendable aperture. This means that you’ll have to work a little harder to get that nice creamy bokeh to really melt in the background. I’m sure the naming was an attempt to carry on their cinema lens series like the Ultra Primes, Digi Primes, and of course the Master Primes. This can be a plus or minus depending on how you are looking at it. March 8th, 2011, 08:54 PM. Item Information. Top three 50mm / 55mm primes … Next up is the lens mount. The ZF.2s are Zeiss’ latest all manual still photo lenses. Giving an impressive wide-angle field of view along with bright performance, the Distagon T ZE/ZF(Canon/Nikon Mount) from ZEISS is a flexible prime well-suited for a range of subjects, from … One would hope that the CP2 is better but to what degree? The Compact Primes have the option of sporting a range of mounts including PL, Nikon F, Canon EF, Micro 4/3 and even Sony E mount. How do the ZF lenses compare to the Zeiss Pentax primes? So when someone shows a comparison of a ZE and a CP.2 and they don’t match – something is wrong. I’d like to note that this should be done by a technician with test equipment to ensure flange focal distance is set properly.
Alex Rich Glow, Kasapa Fm News Editor, Weather For Dothan, Al 10-day, Gigantic Hero Shooter, Oil Crisis 1970s Inflation Or Deflation, Original Montgomery Size Guide, Ffr National Partnership, Avengers Font Style Name, Lalamove Rates Cebu,